The Architecture of Passing By

The City as a Frame

I went out with a camera, a roll of black-and-white film, and no particular destination.

The city was doing what it always does.

People crossed streets.

Waited for trains.

Walked beneath buildings.

Passed through light and shadow.

Nothing remarkable was happening.

And perhaps that was the point.

Architecture is designed to stay.

Walls, windows, columns, staircases and platforms hold their positions while life moves through them.

A person enters the frame for a few seconds.

Then disappears.

The building remains.

Photography allows these two different measures of time to meet: the permanence of structure and the temporary presence of people.

Sometimes the photograph is not really about either one.

It is about the brief relationship between them.

With film, there is little reason to chase every possible photograph.

Thirty-six frames encourage patience.

You begin to look longer.

A wall may already have the right geometry.

The light may already be right.

Only one thing is missing.

Someone passing by.

So you wait.

Waiting Rather Than Searching

Not for something extraordinary, but for an ordinary person to enter an ordinary place at precisely the right moment.

Then the architecture becomes a stage.

And everyday movement becomes choreography.

Perhaps this is what interests me most about photographing cities.

Not landmarks.

Not architecture alone.

Not even people alone.

But the space between them.

A figure beneath a large building.

A shadow crossing concrete.

Someone appearing briefly in a carefully constructed world.

The photograph holds what the city itself barely notices.

A moment that existed for a second and then continued on its way.

The architecture will remain.

The people will change.

And somewhere between those two lives the photograph.

Discover more...